AI Text & Philosophy Dialogue Benchmark

This is not a standardized benchmark. As a philosophy researcher, I regularly converse with major models using the same written materials and roughly the same prompts for cross-model comparison. This may be a niche testing scenario — it is unclear whether model developers specifically train for it, or whether general capability naturally manifests in philosophical dialogue and complex textual reasoning. To my knowledge, only Claude has dedicated philosopher dialogue.

I believe philosophical dialogue is one of AI's most important capabilities. The scores here come from my actual conversations and personal criteria, not a fixed question bank. This requires a particular craft: model developers may excel at engineering evaluation, while I am better positioned to assess a model's thinking ability from the user's perspective.

The scores are sparse — "n/a" for a model on some dimension means I have not yet examined it in enough scenarios, not that it performed poorly. I will not pad the chart with lazy scoring.